SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Mad) 658

B.SUBHASHAN REDDY, K.GNANAPRAKASAM
C. S. Kuppuraj – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Secretary to Government, Public (Buildings) Department – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: Sriram Panchu, S.C for T. Mohan in W.P. No.33493 of 2003, Mohan Parasaran, S.C. for R. Parthasarathy in W.P. No. 35205 of 2003, R. Thiagarajan, S.C. for S. Sundaresan W.P. No. 35517 of 2003, R. Thiagarajan, S.C. for P.V. Ramachandran, Adv. in W.P. Nos. 35691, R. Latha, Adv. in W.P. No. 35825 of 2003
For Respondents/Defendant: N.R. Chandran, A.G. assisted by V. Raghupathi, G.P., K.A. Ravindran, Adv. for CMDA, P. Sundaram, and P. Bagyalakshmi, Advs. for Chennai Corpporation, V.T. Gopalan, Addl. S.G. assisted by P. Wilson, ACGSC and G. Masilamani, S.C. for G.M. Mani Associates

JUDGMENT

B. Subhashan Reddy, C.J.

1. Justiciability of Governmental decision to construct a new Secretariat at Kottuppuram of Chennai city is a question for consideration in these matters. The further question is whether a draft notification issued under Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986, can be put into action even before its emergence as a final notification under sub-clause (d) of sub-Rule 3 of Rule 5 thereof.

2. The Secretariat of the Government of Tamil Nadu is presently located in Fort St.George, Kamarajar Salai. Apart from the building constructed during the British regime, new structures were erected later during 1970s. The State Government felt that accommodation was not sufficient and that the existing structures, be it old or the one constructed during 1970s, are not in good condition and that a new Secretariat building was necessary, both in terms of quantity and quality of accommodation. Earlier, the State Government thought of constructing a new Secretariat in the property occupied by Queen Mary's College, which is a few buildings away from the present Secretariat. But there was spate of litigations in W.P. Nos. 10750 of 2003 etc. batch before this Court and because











































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top