SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Mad) 3675

ARUNA JAGADEESAN
G. G. Kannan – Appellant
Versus
Saleem – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: R. Rajaraman, Adv.

ORDER

Aruna Jagadeesan, J.

1. This Civil Revision Petition is preferred against the order dated 18.08.2009 passed in unnumbered E.A. of 2009 in E.P. No. 249 of 2002 in R.C.O.P. No. 73 of 1985 on the file of Principal District Munsif Court, Kumbakonam.

2. An ex-parte order of eviction has been passed against one Theskhnamoorthy, who is said to have let out the property to the petitioner executing a rent deed in his favour by getting a sum of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees fifteen thousand only) as consideration on 18.08.1998. According to the petitioner, he was paying the rent of Rs. 750/- (Rupees seven hundred and fifty only) per month to the said Theskhnamoorthy till January 2008. Thereafter, it is alleged that Theskhnamoorthy colluded with the decree holder and refused to receive the rent. Subsequently an exparte eviction had come to have been passed.

3. Admittedly, the petitioner is not a party to the proceedings in R.C.O.P. No. 73/85. It is submitted by the petitioner that he is running a hotel and tea stall in the name and style of "HOTEL SRIRAM CABE". On an apprehension that he may be evicted forcibly, it is said that he has filed a suit in O.S. No. 129 of 2008 on the file of the learned P










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top