R.MALA
State rep. By Inspector Vigilance and Anti-corruption Cuddalore – Appellant
Versus
Ramalingam – Respondent
1. The Criminal Appeal arises out of the judgment of acquittal, dated 30.04.2002, made in Spl. C.C.No.5 of 1984, on the file of the learned Special Additional District Judge-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Cuddalore, whereby the accused was acquitted of the offences under Sections 120B IPC and 5(2) r/w 5(1)(e) of P.C. Act and 420 IPC and 5 (2) r/w 5(1)(e) and 5(3A) of P.C. Act and 5(2) r/w 5(1)(e) of P.C. Act and 420 & 109(12 counts) IPC and 5(3A) of P.C. Act and 420 IPC and 116 (5 counts) IPC.
2. The appellant herein has filed a charge sheet stating that A2/Respondent/Dr.Ramalingam was working as a Medical Officer at Nallur Primary Health Centre as a public servant and A1 was working as Medical Officer at Mangalampettai Primary Health Centre as a public servant and the accused 3, 4, 17 were working as workers in Dasal Stores Ware pipes and the accused 5 to 7 and 18 to 20 were working in Tannel Ceramics, Virudhachalam and A8 to A16 and A21 and A22 were working in Tannel Art Battery, Virudhachalam and these two Companies come under Tamil Nadu Ceramics Limited and A1 and A2 between November 1977 and January 1978 were conspiring together with the Approvers N.V.Devanathan an
AIR 1981 SC 113 (Sirajudeen v. State of Karnataka)
AIR 1976 SC 832 (Dharamdeo Singh and others v. The State of Bihar)
(1983) 2 SCC 21 (Babu and others v. State of Uttar Pradesh)
In 2009 (15) SCC 200 (State of Maharashtra v. Dnyaneshwar Laxman Rao Wankhede)
AIR 1979 SC 1782 (Dhan Kumar v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.