M.VENUGOPAL
Lalithammal (deceased) – Appellant
Versus
Rajalakshmi – Respondent
Common Judgment
S.A.No.131 of 1993:
1. The Appellant/Defendant (later deceased) has preferred the present Second Appeal as against the Judgment and Decree dated 25.03.1991 in A.S.No.12 of 1989 passed by the Learned Sub Judge, Cuddalore in modifying the Judgment and Decree dated 28.03.1989 in O.S.No.692 of 1986 passed by the Learned District Munsif, Cuddalore. During the pendency of the Second Appeal No.131 of 1993, the Appellant/Defendant has expired and hence, the Appellants 2 to 5 have been brought on record as Legal Representatives of the deceased sole Appellant as per order dated 11.09.2004 in C.M.P.No.21293 of 2003.
Cross Appeal No.48 of 1997: The Respondents/Plaintiffs (in S.A.No.131 of 1993) have preferred the instant Cross Appeal as against the Judgment and Decree dated 25.03.1991 in A.S.No.12 of 1989 passed by the Learned Sub Judge, Cuddalore, in so far as they are adverse to them. S.A.No.1181 of 1995: The Appellant/Plaintiff has filed the present Second Appeal as against the Judgment and Decree dated 25.03.1991 in A.S.No.14 of 1989 passed by the Learned Sub Judge, Cuddalore in declaring her half share in respect of the suit property etc.
2. The Plaint Facts i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.