SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Mad) 2534

M.VENUGOPAL
T. Sekar – Appellant
Versus
District Adi Dravidar & Tribal Welfare Officer – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:D. Bhaskaran, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mrs. T.P. Savitha, Govt. Advocate.

JUDGMENT:-

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner informs this Court that the writ petition has become an infructuous one. He has also made an endorsement to that effect. Recording the said fact, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top