SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Mad) 2256

V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH
. – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent


Judgment :

1. This application is filed by the applicants / defendants seeking appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to determine the fair value of the property to enable the defendants to buy out the share of the plaintiff at the fair value.

2. Application No.1425 of 2011:

This application is filed by the applicant / plaintiff praying this Court to pass a final decree in the above suit for partition by dividing the suit property by metes and bounds and to allot 1/5th share to the applicant / plaintiff.

3. Application No.1426 of 2011:

This application is filed by the applicant / plaintiff seeking appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to divide the suit property by metes and bounds and to allot 1/5th share to the applicant / plaintiff.

4. Heard Mr. T.V. Ramanujun, learned senior counsel appearing for Mr. P.V.S. Giridhar & Sai Associates, learned counsel for the applicants / defendants in A.No.3730 of 2011 and respondents in A.Nos.1425 and 1426 of 2011 and Mr. G.K.R. Pandian, learned counsel appearing for the respondent in A.No.3730 of 2011 and applicant / plaintiff in A.Nos.1425 and 1426 of 2011.

5. The learned senior counsel would submit in his argument that the applicants were


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top