High Court of Judicature at Madras
VINOD K. SHARMA
Savithiri Ammal
Versus
The Executive Engineer, Thiruvallore District & Others
W.P.No.21160 of 2011 & M.P.No.1 of 2011
Decided On : 09-07-2012
Mandamus - Electricity Connection - The court issued a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to restore the domestic electricity connection that was disconnected, based on the enforceable decree for permanent injunction and the pending challenge to the demand notice in another writ petition.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought a writ of Mandamus to restore a domestic electricity connection that was disconnected due to a demand notice for penalty. The petitioner's late husband had been acquitted of theft of electricity in a criminal case, but the respondents imposed a penalty and initiated civil suits. Despite a decree for permanent injunction, the electricity was disconnected during the pendency of a writ petition challenging the demand notice.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the respondents' action in disconnecting the electricity during the pendency of the writ petition and in defiance of the decree for permanent injunction was not sustainable in law. The court issued a writ of Mandamus directing the restoration of the electricity connection, subject to the final decision in the pending writ petition challenging the demand notice.
Issues: The issues involved the enforceability of the decree for permanent injunction, the validity of the demand notice for penalty, and the respondents' authority to disconnect the electricity during the pendency of the writ petition.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the respondents could not disconnect the electricity in defiance of the decree for permanent injunction and during the pendency of the writ petition challenging the demand notice. The court also considered the essential nature of electricity as a commodity and the efficacy of the remedy of execution in enforcing the injunction order.
Final Decision: The writ petition was allowed, and a writ of Mandamus was issued to restore the electricity connection. The restoration was subject to the final decision in the pending writ petition challenging the demand notice. No costs were awarded.
1. The petitioner has approached this Court, with a prayer for issuance of writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the respondents to restore domestic electricity connection disconnected on 12.09.2011, in Card No.346-005-485.
2. The husband of the petitioner Thiru. M. Govindappa Naidu, holding the Consumer No.152, was charged with theft of energy in the year 1997. A criminal case vide Crime No.1503 of 1997, was registered against the late husband of petitioner. The learned Judicial Magistrate-II, Thiruthani, acquitted the husband of the petitioner of the charge of theft of electricity. The revision filed by the Respondents against the order of acquittal was also dismissed.
3. The respondents, after having failed to prosecute the husband of the petitioner on the criminal side, proceeded departmentally to impose penalty of theft of 16,338 units. The Assistant Executive Engineer/Rural/Tiruttani imposed penalty of Rs.1,81,352/- (Rupees One Lakh Eighty-one Thousand three Hundred and Fifty Two only).
4. The husband of petitioner, being aggrieved by the order imposing penalty, filed Civil Suit O.S.No.29 of 1998 in the District Munsif Court of Tiruttani. The suit was dismissed on 24.01.2000 as not pressed, but inspite of dismissal of the suit, the late Govindappa Naidu did not deposit the money.
5. However, when the steps were taken to disconnect the electric connection of the late Govindappa Naidu, he filed ordinary suit No.157 of 2001. The suit was decreed exparte on 10.10.2006, and a decree for permanent injunction was passed, restraining the respondents from disconnecting the domestic electric connection.
6. After the death of husband of petitioner, petitioner was served with demand notice for deposit of Rs.1,81,352/- (Rupees One Lakh Eighty One Thousand Three Hundred and Fifty Two only) stipulating that in the event of non payment of demand, the electric connection in Card No.346-005-485 will be disconnected.
7. The petitioner, being aggrieved by the demand notice, filed W.P.20541 of 2011, which is pending in this Court, but no interim order was passed by this Court in this writ petition, therefore, the domestic electric connection of the petitioner was disconnected on 12.09.2011.
8. The correct remedy with the petitioner was to file interim application, in the pending writ petition, but the petitioner has chosen to file this second writ petition, during the pendency of first writ, by pleading that act of disconnection of electricity give a fresh cause of action.
9. Leaned counsel for the petitioner challenged the action of disconnecting the electricity, on the ground of it being arbitrary, as it was not open to the respondents to disconnect the electric connection during pendency of writ petition, and that the disconnection of connection is comtemptuous, being in disobedience of the decree of permanent injunction passed against the respondents.
10. The writ petition is opposed by the learned counsel for the respondents, on the ground that the petitioner as an agreement holder, is bound by the terms and conditions of supply of electricity, therefore, has no locus standi to dispute the demand.
11. It is also the case of respondents, that the land and well with S.C.No.152 stood sold by the late husband of petitioner, therefore, petitioner has no concern with S.C.No.152 now. However, the main ground to challenge the writ is that as per the Clause 17(8) of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code, a consumer having more than one service connection, if commits a defaults in payment of dues, relating to one service connections, then the other service connection in the name of consumer can be disconnected after issuing notice, till the arrears of service connection are paid. The stand in reply is that this is what has been done.
12. There can be no dispute, that on account of non payment of dues in one connection by consumer, it is open to the respondents to disconnect the electricity, under the normal circumstances. H
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.