SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Mad) 2745

G.RAJASURIA
S. Sundaram – Appellant
Versus
K. Srinivasan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:M.V. Krishnan, Advocate.

Judgment :-

1. Animadverting upon the order dated 10.1.2012 passed by the District Munsif, Palacode, Dharmapuri District, in O.S.No.Nil of 2012, this civil revision petition is filed.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, at the entertaining stage itself.

3. A thumb nail sketch of the germane facts absolutely necessary for the disposal of this revision would run thus:

(i) The revision petitioners herein filed the plaint with the following prayer: "To pass a judgment and decree:

a) Declaring the sale deed dated 10.7.2006 bearing document No.839/2006 registered in the office of Sub-Registrar at Marandahalli, was obtained as security for the loan amount provided to plaintiffs by the defendant;

b) Granting permanent injunction to restrain the defendant and his men from in any manner trespassing into the suit property or interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of plaintiffs into the suit property;

c) Directing the defendant to pay costs of suit to the plaintiff." (extracted as such)

However, the lower Court rejected the plaint itself.

4. Being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the same, this revision has been focussed.

5. When this Court posed the question as t


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top