SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Mad) 2883

V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH
Petitioner – Appellant
Versus
Respondent – Respondent


Judgment :

V. PERIYA KARUPPIAH, J.

O.A.No.446 of 2011

1. This application has been filed seeking an order of ad-interim, interim, temporary injunction restraining the respondent, its directors, men, servants, agents, successors in business, retailers, legal representatives, heirs, assigns or any other persons claiming through or under them, from in any manner using or otherwise dealing with the trade ark / trade name / domain name 'O2' or any other mark which is identical / similar to the applicant's registered trademark amounting to infringement of the trademark 'O2' registered under No.1574694 in classes 5, 28 and 42 or in any other manner whatsoever pending disposal of the suit.

2. O.A.No.447 of 2011

This application has been filed seeking an order of ad-interim, interim, temporary injunction restraining the respondent, its directors, men, servants, agents, successors in business, retailers, legal representatives, heirs, assigns or any other persons claiming through or under them, from using the mark 'O2' or any other mark similar thereto in respect of their trade, business as part of their trade name / business name / corporate name / domain name, in websites, service mark, spa






























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top