G.RAJASURIA
Arunagiri – Appellant
Versus
H. Surajbai rep. D. Hiralal Sharma – Respondent
1. Animadverting upon the judgment and decree dated 26.03.2012 passed by the learned VIII Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai in R.C.A.No.822 of 2007 reversing the order and decree dated 28.09.2007 passed by the learned XVI Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai in RCOP No.1993 of 2006, this civil revision petition has been focussed by the tenant.
2. The parties, for convenience sake, are referred to here under according to their litigative status and ranking before the Rent Controller.
3. Compendiously and concisely, the germane facts absolutely necessary and germane for the disposal of this civil revision petition would run thus:
(i) The respondent herein/the landlady preferred RCOP No.1993 of 2006, to get evicted the revision petitioner/tenant on the ground of wilful default in paying the fair rent as fixed by the learned Rent Controller in one other RCOP proceedings, invoking Section 10(2) (i) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act.
(ii) The tenant resisted the RCOP.
(iii) During enquiry, on the side of the landlady, one Jagadesh Prasad examined himself as P.W1 and marked Exs.P1 to P4. On the side of the respondent/tenant, R.Ws.1 and 2 were exam
3. E.Palanisamy V. Palanisamy by LRS and others (2003) 1 SCC 123
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.