1. These civil revision petitions are focussed as against the fair and decreetal orders dated 13.09.2011 passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Villupuram in I.A.Nos.281 of 2011 and 46 of 2011 in A.S.No.107 of 2009.

2. Heard both sides.

3. A thumb nail sketch of the germane facts, absolutely necessary for the disposal of these two civil revision petitions would run thus:

a) The learned counsel for the revision petitioners/appellants/plaintiffs would echo the cri de coeur of his clients to the effect that the appeal filed by the revision petitioners was dismissed for default; whereupon they filed an application I.A.No.281 of 2011 for restoring the appeal in time; that was returned to comply with technical defects; however, there was delay in representation of the said I.A.No.281 of 2011 while it was in unnumbered stage to the tune of 275 days. Hence, I.A.No.46 of 2011 was filed to get the delay of 275 days in representing the said I.A.No.281 of 2011 condoned. Whereas, both the applications were dismissed. Here it is to be noted that even before condoning the delay in representation, the main restoration application was also numbered.

b) Being aggrieved by and d