1. Animadverting upon the order dated 7.02.2011 passed in I.A.No.64 of 2009 in unnumbered Pauper Appeal No.......of 2009, by the on the file of the Principal District Judge, Namakkal, this civil revision petition is focussed.

2. Heard both sides.

3. A thumbnail sketch of the relevant facts absolutely necessary for the disposal of this revision, would run thus:

The respondent herein filed the suit for recovery of money based on a pro note. After contest the suit was decreed, as against which the defendant who is the revision petitioner herein, preferred appeal informa pauperis. The appellate Court after hearing both sides, rejected the prayer of the defendant to file the appeal informa pauperis.

4. Being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the said order, this revision has been focussed on various grounds.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner placing reliance on the grounds of revision, would pilot his arguments to the effect that absolutely there is no iota or shred, shard or miniscule extent of evidence to show that the defendant is having sufficient amount to a tune of Rs.31,525/- to pay as Court fee and prosecute the appeal. Simply because there is admission on