SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Mad) 3395

High Court of Judicature at Madras
R. SUDHAKAR, J.
Best Cotton Mills, (Unit of Best Corporation Limited), Dharapuram represented by its Manager, P. Muthukrishnan & Another
Versus
Chief Engineer (Distribution), Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Coimbatore & Another
WRIT PETITION NOS.11101 & 11102 OF 2012 & M.P. NO. 1 OF 2012
Decided On : 02-08-2012

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:AR.L. Sundaresan, SC. for R.S. Pandiyaraj, Advocate.
For the Respondents:S.K. Rameshwar, Advocate.

Headnote:TAMILNADU ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION CODE, 2004 - Section 27 - Order by demanding excess of over charges of electricity - Held, the proviso to Regulation 27 of the Electricity Distribution code speaks about the refusal to supply electricity to an intending consumer who has defaulted in payment of dues to the respondent licensee in respect of any other service connection in his name. It is not a case of electricity supply to an intending consumer or a new supply. The respondents are not able to point out any other provision, and there is nothing in the Distribution Code to hinder the grant of benefit to the petitioners as sought for - Impugned order set aside.

Judgment :-

1. Both Writ Petitions are filed praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the second respondent in his letter No.SEU/UDT/AEE/GL/AE/SDM/F.HT GL/D.No.0513/12 dated 12.03.2012, quash the same as unsustainable in law and consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to install dedicated feeder vide application dated 21.07.2005.

2. Mr.S.K.Rameshwar, learned standing counsel appearing for the electricity board takes notice on behalf of the respondents. By consent both the writ petitions are taken up together for final disposal.

3. The two petitioners are private limited companies and have a separate high tension electricity service connection. Petitioner Best Cotton Mills draw electricity supply under HTSC No.129 and the petitioner Balu Spinning Mills Pvt. Ltd., draw electricity supply under HTSC No.197. In view of the power crisis prevailing in the State, the petitioners wanted to avail power through third party sources to meet their industrial consumption requirements and for this purpose wanted to install a dedicated feeders since no looping of the injected energy is possible in categories of consumers in the vicinity. The dedicated feeder line, according to the petitioners, will help the petitioners as well as Board to arrest or stop leakage of electricity. For this purpose, on 21.7.2005, the two petitioners made a joint application to the second respondent to provide a separate 22 KV feeder to the petitioners industries. This was sanctioned by the second respondent vide letter dated 21.12.2005 and the petitioners were directed to remit a sum of Rs.9,24,960/- in favour of the respondent Board. The above amount was deposited by receipt dated 19.1.2006. They executed an agreement to the effect that after executing the work, due to escalation in cost of materials, if any excess amount is payable, it would be borne by the petitioners as requested by the second respondent. In spite of complying with all the requirements as above, the respondents failed to provide the dedicated feeder, as per the sanction dated 21.12.2005. The matter is kept pending for a long number of years. On 27.2.2012, a follow up request was made for the dedicated feeder line. In response to that, the impugned communications were received in letter No.SEU/UDT/AEE/GL/AE/SDM/F.HT GL/D.No.0513/12 dated 12.3.2012 which are under challenge. For better clarity of the issue the brief order of the Superintending Engineer in respect of Best Cotton Mills is set out hereunder:-

“Adverting to the above, while scrutinizing the records for considering your request for transfer of Distribution Transformer from 22 KV Best – Balu feeder to 22 KV Town feeder fed from 110/22KV Dharapuram Substation under DCW basis, it is found that sum of Rs.62,30,286/- (Rupees Sixty two lakhs thirty thousands two hundred and eighty six only) is outstanding towards excess over charges for peak & Normal hour in your concern of HT Sc No.129, M/s.Best Cotton Mills.

Therefore, you are requested to remit the above outstanding arrears for considering your application.

The receipt of this letter may be acknowledged.”

In respect of Balu Spinning Mills the impugned order reads as follows:-

“Adverting to the above, while scrutinizing the records for considering your request for transfer of Distribution Transformer from 22 KV Best – Balu feeder to 22 KV Town feeder fed from 110/22KV Dharapuram Substation under DCW basis, it is found that sum of Rs.72,43,126/- (Rupees Seventh two lakhs fourth three thousands one hundred and twenty six only) is outstanding towards short levy of excess demand due to non implementing of quota demand in your concern of HT Sc No.197, M/s.Balu Spinning Mills Pvt. Ltd., as per TNERC Suo motu proceedings No.1, dated 28.10.2009.

Therefore, you are requested to remit the above outstanding arrears for considering your application.

The receipt of this letter may be acknowledged.”

Aggrieved thereby, the present writ petitions have been

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top