1. Animadverting upon the order dated 27.04.2012 passed in O.S.S.R.No.17957 of 2012 by the learned I Asst. Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, this civil revision petition is focussed.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would detail and delineate that even without numbering the plaint as O.S., simply it was returned with the following endorsement,

"The above suit is filed by the plaintiff for mandatory injunction directing the defendant to vacate the portion permitted to occupy in the suit property. The plaintiff had paid court fees under Section 27(C) of the T.N. Court Fees and Suit Valuation Act 1955. Relying the Judgments in "1995 TLNJ 217, AIR 1984 Kerala 224" in which it was held that the suit for Mandatory injunction lies after revocation of the license and Court fee payable under Section 27 (C) for permanent injunction is proper. In a suit for injunction where the relief sought is with reference to any immovable property where the plaintiff alleges that his title to the property is denied and to where an issue to frame regarding the title to the property the fee shall be computed on one half of the market val