SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Mad) 3863

G.RAJASURIA
S. Dakshina – Appellant
Versus
Chinnaponnu – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:C.Jagadish, Advocate.
For the Respondents:R.Gowri, Advocate.

Judgment :-

This appeal is focussed at the instance of the original plaintiff animadverting upon the judgment and decree dated 21.11.2005 passed in A.S.No.42 of 2005 by the learned Additional Subordinate Judge, Chengalpattu, confirming the judgment and decree passed by the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thirukallukundram in O.S.No.284 of 1996 dated 28.01.2005.

2. The parties are referred to hereunder according to their litigative status and ranking before the trial Court.

3. Compendiously and concisely, the germane facts absolutely necessary for the disposal of this Second Appeal would run thus:

(a) The appellant in the Second Appeal as plaintiff, filed the suit seeking the following reliefs:

"(i) For declaration of plaintiffs title to B schedule property and consequential relief of vacant possession of the same;

(ii) For declaration of plaintiffs title to the C schedule property and for consequential relief of permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their men, agents and servants from in any way interfering with the plaintiffs peaceful possession and enjoyment of the same ; and

(iii) For costs." (Extracted as such)

(b) Precisely and pithily, the gist a















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top