SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Mad) 1517

S.TAMILVANAN
Manickam – Appellant
Versus
Rahamath Beevi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
V.Raghupahi, Srinath Sridevan

JUDGMENT

( 1. ) HEARD the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the respondents.

( 2. ) THIS civil revision has been preferred, challenging the order, dated 23.02.2010 made in E.P.No.87 of 2003 in O.S.No.401 of 1981 on the file of the learned District Munsif, Thiruvarur.

As per the impugned order, dated 23.02.2010, demolition of superstructure and delivery of possession of the suit property was ordered by the Court below by 30.03.2010, aggrieved by which, the revision is preferred by the petitioners / judgment-debtors.

( 3. ) IT is an admitted fact that the suit was filed by one S.M.Vajeer Ussan against the revision petitioners herein, seeking a decree, directing the defendants therein to deliver the possession of the suit schedule property described in the plaint, marked in red colour as ALJI, after removing the construction put up by the petitioners herein and also sought further direction for appointment of an officer of the Court to demolish the superstructure and also to grant permanent injunction restraining the defendants from proceeding with further construction over the blue shaded portion of the plaint schedule property. The suit was decreed by the trial


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top