SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Mad) 45

A.SELVAM
A/M. Kothandaramasamy Koil Thrupuvanam, Rep. By Its Managing Trustee Jayaprakash – Appellant
Versus
Vairam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
T.Srinivasa Raghavan, N.Krishnaveni, A.L.Gandhimathi, S.Kumar

JUDGMENT

( 1. ) THE Judgment and decree dated 09.08.2007 passed in Appeal Suit No.41 of 2006 by the Principal Sub Court, Kumbakonam are being challenged in the present Second Appeal.

( 2. ) THE appellant herein as plaintiff has instituted Original Suit No.4 of 2004 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Valangaiman at Kumbakonam for the relief of mandatory injunction, wherein the present respondents have been shown as defendants.

The trial Court after considering the rival evidence adduced on either side has decreed the suit as prayed for. Against the Judgment and decree passed by the trial Court, the defendants 1 to 4 as appellants have preferred Appeal Suit No.41 of 2006 on the file of the first appellate Court.

( 3. ) THE first appellate Court after hearing both sides and upon reappraising the evidence available on record has allowed Appeal Suit No.41 of 2006 and thereby set aside the Judgment and decree passed by the trial Court in Original Suit No.4 of 2004. Against the Judgment and decree passed by the first appellate Court, this Second Appeal has been preferred at the instance of the plaintiff as appellant.

( 4. ) AT the time of admitting the present Second Appeal



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top