SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Mad) 4098

K.B.K.VASUKI
MDR Cranes & Infrastructure (P) LTD – Appellant
Versus
L&T Finance Ltd – Respondent


Judgment :-

K.B.K. Vasuki, J.

1. The first respondent in A.No.3510 of 2012 is the applicant herein. The application A.No.3510 of 2012 is filed for an appointment of Advocate Commissioner to seize Hydraulic Drilling Pilling Rig more fully described in the schedule appended to the judges summon either in the premises of the respondents or wherever it is found and deliver the same to the custody of the applicant.

2. The applicant M/s. L & T Finance Ltd has come forward with the application A.No.3510 of 2012 for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner in exercise of their right available to the applicant as contained in Article 13 of the loan cum hypothecation agreement dated 29.12.2009 entered into between the applicant and the first respondent in respect of the loan sanctioned for purchase of the schedule mentioned equipment. The second respondent stood as guarantor for due repayment of the amount and executed a separate guarantee deed dated 29.12.2009. As per the terms and conditions of the loan cum hypothecation agreement, the borrower agreed to repay the amount in monthly installments and the finance company is entitled to treat the entire amount as due and recall the entire debt,












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top