SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Mad) 4195

C.S.KARNAN
R. Saravanan – Appellant
Versus
Pavathal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:V. Bharathidasan, Advocate.
For the Respondent:R. Marudhachalamurthy, Advocate.

Judgment :

The revision petitioner / appellant / respondent has preferred the present revision in Crl.R.C.No.146 of 2009 against the judgment passed in C.A.No.117 of 2008, on the file of Additional District Court-cum-Fast Track Court-I, Erode, dated 19.11.2008 against Crl.M.P.No.729 of 2007 on the file of District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Kodumudi, Erode District, 28.01.2008.

2. The short facts of the case are as follows:-

The petitioner / mother had filed a petition in Crl.M.P.No.729 of 2007 before the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Kodumudi, Erode District against the respondent / son. It was submitted that the respondent had neglected to maintain the petitioner in her old age and had stopped providing any monetary assistance and had driven the petitioner out of the house. The respondent had not provided even the basic necessities to the petitioner to lead her life. Hence, the petitioner has filed a petition praying for protection to her from Domestic Violence as per Section 12 and 23 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

3. The respondent in his counter had submitted that he is an agriculturist and that he had taken a loan of Rs.20









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top