SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Mad) 4556

K.CHANDRU
J. S. Rajkumar – Appellant
Versus
Shyna Paul – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:Rajnish Pathiyil, Advocate.
For The Respondent:Shyna Paul, Advocate.

Judgment :

K. CHANDRU, J.

1. This application is filed by a third party to the Original Petition seeking to revoke the letters of administration granted in O.P.No.520 of 2004 vide order dated 14.6.2007 in favour of the first respondent. On notice being served, a counter affidavit has been filed by the first respondent, dated 12.10.2012. The first respondent also filed a written submission.

2. Heard the arguments of Ms.S.Geetha, learned counsel appearing for the applicant and Mr.G. Ilamurugu, learned counsel appearing for the first respondent / original petitioner.

3. The original petition was filed by the first respondent for the grant of letters of administration to the petitioner with the Will annexed left by late Dr. V.M. Chandrahas, dated 08.11.2001 being the sole beneficiary under the Will, having the effect throughout the State of Tamil Nadu. The O.P was admitted on 20.9.2004. After following due procedures, this court had granted letters of administration to the first respondent by an order dated 14.6.2007.

4. This applicant claims that the schedule property is a flat in a residential complex situated in New Door No.10, Valliammal Street, Kilpauk, measuring an extent of 480













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top