Both the above civil miscellaneous appeals and the civil revision petition are directed against the fair and decretal orders both dated 12.4.2000, while the C.M.A. No.1056 of 2000 and C.M.A. No.191 of 2001 are preferred against the fair and decretal order made in E.A. No.324 of 1998, the C.R.P. No.2589 of 2001 is filed against the fair and decretal order made in E.A. No.39 of 1999, in one and the same E.P. No.82 of 1997 in O.S. No.175 of 1988 by the Court of Principal Subordinate Judge, Dindigul.

2. For the sake of easy reference and convenience, the parties are hereinafter referred to as they are arrayed in C.M.A. No.1056 of 2000.

3. Tracing the history of the coming into being of all the above matters, it comes to be known that the appellant in C.M.A. No.1056 of 2000 viz., Murugesan and Company had filed the suit in O.S. No.175 of 1988 against the respondents 1 to 6 for recovery of a sum of Rs.3,88,756.01 with interest at 18% p.a. from the date of plaint till the date of realisation and the said suit having been decreed ex parte, the plaintiff therein had filed an execution petition in E.P. No.82 of 1997 for recovery of Rs.9,79,235.30 with subsequent interest praying t