SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Mad) 2469

K.CHANDRU
Rajchand Tea Industries – Appellant
Versus
Judicial Magistrate Class First, Raipur Chhattisgarh State – Respondent


COMMON ORDER

The petitioners in all these petitions seek to quash the process issued by the first respondent Judicial Magistrate I Class, Raipur, Chhattisgarh State, or to transfer the case to the file of the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Coonoor in Tamil Nadu State.

2. Insofar as W.P.No. 34289 of 2006 is concerned, it is a strange prayer where the petitioners seek to quash the un-numbered process in No. 541 of 2005 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raipur, Chhattisgarh or to transfer the same to the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class in the State of Tamil Nadu.

3. It is not known as to how the petitioners can file a writ petition even before the process can be issued by the competent Criminal Court and it is also not clear as to how the petitioners have produced an alleged copy of the un-numbered process and filed it along with the typed set. It is stated in the affidavit that they have received summons from the Court for hearing even though there was no such summons in respect of this case. Therefore, it is clearly a false statement made in the affidavit. So far as this writ petition is concerned, it is a clear abuse of process of Court and there is absolu













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top