Wanchoo, J.-

This appeal by Special Leave is limited to the question of admissibility in evidence of a certain document in a criminal trial. The brief fact, of the case necessary for elucidation of the question are these: Bhogilal Chunilal Pandya (appellant) was tried for committing criminal breach of trust in respect of Rs. 4,14,750 and the trial was with the aid of a jury. He was the cashier in the employment of Messrs. Morarji Gokuldas Spinning and Weaving Company limited, Bombay. As such he was entrusted with the funds of the company. The charge against him was that between July 1 and December 1, 1954, he embezzled the amounts mentioned above. Among the witnesses for the prosecution were Gopikisan, Chairman, Modi, Secretary, and Santook, a Solicitor of 1 he company. When the defalcation was discovered, certain conversations took place between Gopikisan Modi and Santook who was consulted in this connection, and the appellant, between January 21 and 27, 1955. Santook prepared what are called notes of attendance of these conversations soon afterwards. In his evidence in Court, Santook deposed to what had taken place between him and these persons on those dates. The notes o