This revision raises an important point of law which lends itself to subtle arguments and which is also bereft of authority of this Court.

2. Now to abreviate statement of facts which project this legal issue. Somaram, the revision petitioner, was accused of kidnapping Chandrakala, a minor aged 16½ years daughter of the first respondent Jawanthuraj Lunia, out of the lawful guardianship of her parents. The revision petitioner was employed by the first respondent Jawanthuraj Lunia. On the complaint of Jawanthuraj Lunia, father of Chandrakala, a case was registered by the second respondent. The minor girl was traced in the company of the revision petitioner at Tirupati. The revision petitioner was arrested and later released on bail. The girl was handed over to the first respondent, her father. Originally the revision petitioner was ordered to be released on bail on condition that he should reside at Tiruchirappalli and report everyday before the Cantonment police, but later the condition was modified and he was allowed to report everyday at the C-1 Police Station, Madras The revision petitioner is alleged to have printed pamphlets and distributed them to public and sent a cop