S.RATNAVEL PANDIAN
Public Prosecutor – Appellant
Versus
Kamakshi Ammal – Respondent
The State represented by the learned Public Prosecutor has preferred the above six appeals challenging the order of acquittal passed in S.T.C. Nos, 544, 545, 546, 741, 773 and 774 of 1979 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Tiruchirappalli, acquitting all the accused in the above cases of the charge for contravention of sub-clause (2) of clause 20 of Cotton Textile (Control) Order, 1948 as per Textile Commissioner's Notification No. C.E.R. /10/1977. dated 15th April, 1977, punishable under section 7 (1) (a) (ii) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 as amended in 1974.
2. Now, I shall give the brief facts of these cases, which are similar, leading to the prosecution. The, Textile Inspector (P.W. 1) inspected the respective power loom factories of the accused in each of these cases on various dates noted in the respective complaints and found that the accused had produced dhoties with orders exceeding 6.35 mm. in width containing coloured yarn in the dhoti border. P.W. 1 seized the material objects marked in each of the cases and recorded statements from the concerned accused persons. Show cause notices were issued for contravention of the notification of the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.