SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Mad) 1445

A.SELVAM
Alagammal – Appellant
Versus
Ganesan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
H. Lakshmi Shankar, for Appellants
M.S. Balasubramaniya Iyer, for Respondents

JUDGMENT

A. SELVAM, J.

The judgment and decree dated 16.7.2008 passed in Appeal Suit No. 258 of 2004 by the Additional Subordinate Court, Dindigul are now under challenge.

2. The respondents herein as plaintiffs have instituted Original Suit No.165 of 1998 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Dindigul, for the reliefs of specific performance, damages and also for recovery of money with interest, wherein the present appellants have been shown as defendants.

3. It is averred in the plaint that the suit property is the absolute property of the first defendant. The second and third defendants are the daughters of the first defendant. The first defendant has agreed to sell the suit property in favour of the plaintiffs for a sum of Rs. 21,000/- and received Rs. 3,000/- by way of advance and the terms of agreement have been reduced into writing on 22.11.1990 and on the basis of the instruction given by the first defendant, the defendants 2 & 3 have also been included in the suit sale agreement. It is agreed by the defendants 1 to 3 that they should receive balance of sale amount and register a sale deed in favour of the plaintiffs within six months. The defendants 1 to 3 have a










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top