SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Mad) 1936

M.M.SUNDRESH
S. Ganesan – Appellant
Versus
Bharathirajan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:R. Devaraj, Advocate.
For the Respondent:K.K. Senthil, Duraichamy, Advocates.

Judgment :-

The plaintiff is the appellant. The suit is filed in O.S. No.80 of 1993 on the file of Sub Court, Ramanathapuram seeking declaration and permanent injunction. The case of the plaintiff in a nutshell is as follows.

2. The suit property originally belonged to one Sonaimuthuservai. In pursuant to the partition deed dated 14.05.1970 which is marked as Ex.A2, the suit property was allotted to one of his son by name Balu. The said Balu has executed a registered mortgage in favour of the plaintiff in Ex.A3 dated 27.07.1971. As per the said mortgage deed the plaintiff is entitled to enjoy the income arising out of the suit property in lieu of the interest to the paid by the said Balu. Thereafter a sale deed has been executed by the said Balu in favour of the plaintiff in Ex.A.1 dated 11.06.1975. According to the plaintiff Ex.A4 to E.A36 would show that the plaintiff is in possession and enjoyment of the same as a owner. Since the wife and minor children of Balu have sold the suit property in favour of the defendant under Ex.B5 the plaintiff was constrained to file the suit based upon the title and adverse possession and consequential permanent injunction.

3. The case of the defe









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top