SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Mad) 1848

N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR
G. Girija – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Director (Panchayats) Kancheepuram – Respondent


ADVOCATES APPEARED:
S. Arunachalam, for Petitioner
D. Srinivsan Additional Government Pleader, for Respondents

ORDER

1. By consent of parties, the main writ petition itself is taken for final hearing.

2. The prayer in the writ petition is to quash letter/proceedings of the first respondent made Na.Ka.No. 95 of 2007/A1 dated 7.12.2007, declining the grant of compassionate appointment to the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner got married and therefore she is not entitled to compassionate appointment.

3. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner’s father Udayakumar was employed in the office of the first respondent as Junior Assistant. He died on 26.2.1991 in harness, leaving the petitioner’s mother, the petitioner and others. The petitioner’s family having been in indigent: circumstances and after passing Plus Two examination by the petitioner, she applied for compassionate appointment by application dated 2.6.1997 to the second respondent. When the application was submitted, the petitioner was unmarried.

4. The, petitioner being the eldest daughter, is eligible to be appointed on compassionate ground as no one in her family was in employment. The petitioner furnished required certificates to prove the indigent status of family. However, no order was passed on the application of









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top