S.NAGAMUTHU
Sundari – Appellant
Versus
Sushila – Respondent
1. The petitioners in Crl.R.C.No.608 of 2011 are the Accused in C.C.No.10344 of 2001 on the file of the X Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai. The trial court, by judgement dated 12.04.2006,convicted the petitioners 1 to 3 under Sections 448 & 427 of IPC and sentenced them to undergo simple imprisonment for six months for the offence under Section 448 of IPC; and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/-each in default to undergo simple imprisonment for three months for the offence under Section 427 of IPC and convicted the 4th petitioner under Section 448 r/w 109 and 427 r/w 109 of IPC and sentenced him to undergo simple imprisonment for six months for the offence under Section 448 r/w 109 of IPC; and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/-in default to undergo simple imprisonment for three months for the offence under Section 427 r/w 109 of IPC. Challenging the same, the petitioners filed an appeal in Crl.A.No.123 of 2006. The learned Additional District and Sessions Judge [Fast Track Court No.IV], Chennai, by judgement dated 10.03.2011 dismissed the appeal thereby confirming the conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court. As against the same, the petitioners have come up with this
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.