T.SUDANTHIRAM
Ramu – Appellant
Versus
State, represented by the Inspector of Police, Oomatchikulam Police Station, Madurai District – Respondent
1. The Petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the Respondent – Police for the alleged offences punishable under Section 366 of IPC, in crime No. 89 of 2012, on the file of the Respondent -_Police and hence, seeks Anticipatory Bail.
2. Heard Mr. R. Gandhi, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Mr. C.Ramesh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State.
3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that one Vimaladevi had given a Complaint and the case has been registered in Crime No. 89 of 2012 against the Accused Suganya. It is alleged in the Complaint that the defacto Complainant is the wife of one Suresh @ Mayakrishnan. Her husband had been taken by the Accused Suganya who is also married lady, with the idea of getting money from her husband and the case has been registered under Section 366, IPC. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor further submits that to Habeas Corpus Petitions have been filed in H.C.P.(MD) Nos. 64 & 91 of 2012 before this Honourable Court, i.e., H.C.P(MD) No. 91 of 2012 is filed by one Dinesh, who is the husband of the said Suganya and H.C.P(MD) No 64 of 2012 is filed by one Vimala Devi, who is wife if S
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.