SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Mad) 4271

K.MOHAN RAM, M.DURAISWAMY
R. Syed Mahbool – Appellant
Versus
Parveen Sultana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:L. Mouli, Advocate.
For the Respondent:N. Manoharan, Advocate.

Judgment

M. Duraiswamy, J.

1. The above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal arises against the fair and final order, dated 18.4.2007 passed in G.W.O.P. No.412 of 2005, on the file of the Family Court, Coimbatore.

2. The Appellant is the husband of the Respondent. The Appellant filed a Petition under Section 7 of the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 for appointment of the guardian for his minor daughter Rameeja Amrin, aged 5 years and also to direct the Respondent to hand-over the minor daughter to him.

3. The brief case of the Appellant as follows:

According to the Appellant, he is the husband of the Respondent and their marriage was solemnized on 22.8.1999 at Coimbatore. Out of their wedlock, a female child was born on 2.6.2000 and a male child was born to them on 19.5.2004. The Appellant had previously married one Halimunnisha in the year 1996. Through her a female child was born to them. Thereafter, they got divorce as per the Mahomedan Law, leaving the child with his first wife. The Respondent had already married me Syed Rizwan Ryaz previously and through him a female child was born to them. Thereafter, they got divorce leaving the daughter in the custody of the Respondent. Subsequently, t































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top