SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Mad) 2453

ARUNA JAGADEESAN
Essaki Ammal @ Chitra – Appellant
Versus
Veerabhadra @ Kumar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:S. Meenakshi Sundaram, Advocate.
For the Respondent:S. Pon. Senthilkumar, Advocate.

Judgment :-

1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the fair order and decretal order dated 11.7.2013 passed in I.A. No.54 of 2011 in H.M.O.P. No.19 of 2011 by the learned Principal Sub Judge, Nagercoil, allowing the Petition filed by the Respondent to play the compact disc marked as Ex.P7 in the Court and receive it as evidence.

2. The Respondent/husband has initiated Divorce proceedings as against his wife in H.M.O.P. No.19 of 2011 alleging cruelty against the wife. The Petitioner/wife denied the allegations levelled against her by the Respondent in the Counter filed by her. During the examination of the Respondent as PW1, the compact disc was marked as Ex.P7 subject to the objection raised by the learned Counsel for the Petitioner/wife. According to the Respondent, the Petitioner/wife abused him in a filthy language over cell phone and the Respondent has recorded the same in his cell phone and downloaded in a compact disc which is exhibited as Ex.P7. He filed an Interlocutory Application seeking permission of the Court to display the said compact disc before the Court so as to enable the Court to hear the conversation between the Petitioner and the Respondent.

3. The P

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top