ELIPE DHARMA RAO, ARUNA JAGADEESAN
K. S. Lakshmikumara Thatachariar – Appellant
Versus
T. E. Vijaraghavan – Respondent
Elipe Dharma Rao, J.
1. Nothing under sky is invulnerable to litigation and it seems Almighty Himself is no exception to this universal phenomena.
2. The present litigation is an example of this fact, involving dispute between two schools of Srivaishnavism (Thengalais and Vadagalis), putting Lord Devarajaswami of Kancheepuram (Presiding Deity of one of the 108 ‘Divyadesas’) in continuous bitter litigation.
3. Though it is believed that Lord Devarajaswami laid down across ‘Vegavathi’ river and saved the Temple City Kancheepuram from inundation because of the anger of Goddess Saraswathi. He seems unable to resolve the dispute between the two warring sects of Srivaishnavism. Or, He may be onlooking and enjoying the dispute as part of His ‘Jagannatakam’ with His ‘Jagannatakam’ with His usual, ever fascinating and blissful ‘Childvilasam’. As a result, both the Sects continue to engage in sectarian rivalry and the present litigation is outcome of one of such rivalries.
4. Facts, limited to the extent of understanding the present lis, are that a Scheme decree was passed by the District Court, Chenglepet, in a Suit filed under Section 539 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1882, i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.