1. The petitioners are the Accused in Crime No. 679/2012 dated 06.08.2012 on the file of the first respondent and they have come forward with this petition to quash the FIR against them.

2. The second respondent is the defacto complainant. The allegations in the complaint runs as follows:- The defacto complainant along with other workers are engaged in construction work and that the construction work was undertaken by one Mr.Rajkumar who is the contractor and first accused and the actual construction is undertaken by Mr.Sudanandan, the mason (Maistry) the 2nd accused. The building was constructed as per the direction of the contractors and the mason who are the named accused and they were raising cement pillars and on 06.08.2012, the contractors and mason directed the defacto complainant to construct Arch and the defacto complainant and others protested that the Pillars themselves were wet and therefore if arch is constructed then it will lead to destruction and therefore requested that the arch can be constructed after 10 days for which the contractor and mason overruled their objections and informed them that they will take care of whatever harm that comes in the way and