SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Mad) 597

P.R.SHIVAKUMAR
Linga Nadar – Appellant
Versus
Manohari – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:G. Thangavel, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. The defendant in the original suit is the appellant in the second appeal. The suit O.S.No.51 of 2005 was filed for recovery of a sum of Rs.1,56,613/- consisting of Rs.1,00,000/- as principal component and Rs.56,613 as interest component upto the date of plaint based on the allegation that the appellant herein/defendant borrowed a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- promising to repay the said amount with an interest at the rate of 24% p.a. and executed a promissory note to the said effect on 23.04.2003. The further averment made in the plaint is to the effect that since the appellant/defendant did not make payment either towards principal or towards interest, she had to issue a lawyer's notice on 24.08.2005 which was replied by the appellant/defendant by a reply notice containing allegations which are false according to the respondent/plaintiff and that the same pushed the respondent/plaintiff to file the suit.

2. The suit was resisted by the appellant herein/defendant who filed a written statement contending that he did not borrow any amount from the respondent on 23.04.2003. The appellant/defendant took a stand that he had borrowed a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-from the respondent/plaintiff




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top