P.R.SHIVAKUMAR
Linga Nadar – Appellant
Versus
Manohari – Respondent
1. The defendant in the original suit is the appellant in the second appeal. The suit O.S.No.51 of 2005 was filed for recovery of a sum of Rs.1,56,613/- consisting of Rs.1,00,000/- as principal component and Rs.56,613 as interest component upto the date of plaint based on the allegation that the appellant herein/defendant borrowed a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- promising to repay the said amount with an interest at the rate of 24% p.a. and executed a promissory note to the said effect on 23.04.2003. The further averment made in the plaint is to the effect that since the appellant/defendant did not make payment either towards principal or towards interest, she had to issue a lawyer's notice on 24.08.2005 which was replied by the appellant/defendant by a reply notice containing allegations which are false according to the respondent/plaintiff and that the same pushed the respondent/plaintiff to file the suit.
2. The suit was resisted by the appellant herein/defendant who filed a written statement contending that he did not borrow any amount from the respondent on 23.04.2003. The appellant/defendant took a stand that he had borrowed a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-from the respondent/plaintiff
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.