M.VENUGOPAL
Peyathevar – Appellant
Versus
Ranganathan – Respondent
1. The Petitioners have preferred the present Review Petition as against the Order dated 5/1/2011 in C.R.P.(MD) No.1185 of 2003 passed by this Court.
2. It is to be borne in mind that this Court while passing the order on 5/1/2011 in C.R.P. (MD) No.1185 of 2003 has inter alia observed in paragraph Nos.17 to 20 as follows:-
“17. At this juncture, it is useful for this Court to make a significant mention to the averment made by the revision petitioner/defendant (since deceased) in the sworn statement in the chief examination, in I.A.No.99 of 2002 at paragraph 3, wherein he has mentioned that during 02.11.2000, he has been working as a Teacher in Surlipatti and he used to go to his native place Madurai once in three or four months and when the suit has come up for final hearing on 02.11.2000, his counsel has informed him to his residential address, but he has not received the same and hence, he has not appeared for the hearing on 02.11.2000. The averment made by the revision petitioner/defendant (since deceased) in his own affidavit in the Chief examination in I.A.No.99 of 2002 at paragraph 3 to the effect that during 02.11.2000, he has served in Surlipatti and he used to c
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.