Vinod K. Sharma, J.

1. The plaintiffs/applicants have filed suit for declaration, that the plaintiffs 2 to 4 are the absolute owners of the Schedule-F property and as such entitling to take the vacant possession of the Schedule-F property from the defendants. Consequential relief of mandatory injunction is also prayed for directing the defendants to vacate and deliver the vacant possession of the Schedule-F property to the plaintiffs 2 to 4 by removing the illegal constructions put up in the Schedule-F property.

2. Further declaration is sought for ownership of Schedule-G property with possession and for permanent injunction, restraining the defendants, their men and agents from interfering with the plaintiffs' peaceful possession and enjoyment of the Schedule-G property.

3. It is pleaded case of the plaintiffs/applicants, that the property described in Schedule-A was originally owned by Thiru Munusamy, who purchased the property vide sale deed dated 07.11.1900. After the death of Thiru Munusamy, his son Thiru Ponnusamy sold the land measuring 37.5 cents in the Schedule-A property to the ancestors of the 1st plaintiff's mother, i.e. Elangali Ammal, namely, Rajammal and M