SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Mad) 485

Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
G. RAJASURIA, J.
Amaladoss Stephen
Versus
Seethalakshmi Ammal
C.R.P. (PD)(MD) No. 117 of 2013 & M.P (MD) No. 1 of 2013
Decided on : 22-01-2013

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:G. Prabhu Rajadurai, Advocate.
For the Respondent:G.R. Swaminathan, Advocate.

Permission to withdraw a Civil Revision Petition can be granted, leading to the dismissal of the petition.

Headnote:

Withdrawal - Civil Revision Petition - The court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition as withdrawn upon the request of the revision petitioner.

Fact of the Case:

The learned Counsel for the revision petitioner sought permission to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition and made an endorsement to that effect.

Finding of the Court:

The Civil Revision Petition was dismissed as withdrawn, and consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition was also dismissed. No costs were awarded.

Issues:

Ratio Decidendi: The court granted permission for the withdrawal of the Civil Revision Petition and subsequently dismissed it. The decision was made in view of the endorsement made by the revision petitioner's counsel.

Final Decision: The Civil Revision Petition was dismissed as withdrawn, and the connected Miscellaneous Petition was also dismissed. No costs were awarded.

Judgment :-

1. At the hearing, the learned Counsel for the revision petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Civil Revision Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the above, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed. No costs.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top