SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Mad) 377

R.BANUMATHI, K.K.SASIDHARAN
N. Baskaran – Appellant
Versus
D. Geetha – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellants:K. Narendran, Advocate.
For the Respondent:A.D. Jagadish Chandra, Advocate.

Judgment :-

R.BANUMATHI, J. :-

This intra Court appeal is preferred against the order of learned single Judge in D.No.40597 of 2011 in C.S.No.340 of 2010 (14.2.2012) directing the Appellants-Defendants 1 to 3 to file appropriate application to condone the delay in filing the application to set aside the exparte decree dated 28.09.2011. Appellants are Defendants 1 to 3 in the suit.

2. Brief facts:- Suit property – six grounds in T.S.No.7085/1 and 7085/2 of Thiyagaraya Nagar, Chennai originally belonged to C.P. Natesa Mudaliar, who died intestate on 04.01.1974 leaving behind his wife and children as under:-

C.P. Natesa Mudaliar (died on 04.01.1974)

|

|

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | | | | |

N. Saras- N. Samala N. Kasthuri V. Vimala

N.T. Arasu N. Baskaran

wathy (daughter) (daughter) (unmarried

(son) (son)

(wife) (D2) (D3) daughter (died

on (D1)

(died on died on 30.05.96)

1.11.09)

14.10.93)

Case of Respondent-Plaintiff is that all the legal heirs of C.P. Natesa Mudaliar agreed to sell the suit property to the Respondent and received a










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top