G.RAJASURIA
R. Chandra – Appellant
Versus
Nallammal – Respondent
1. This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to get set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 17.11.2006 passed in E.A.No.216 of 2005 in O.S.No.186 of 1982, by the learned District Munsif, Musiri.
2. Heard both sides.
3. The epitome and the long and the short of the germane facts absolutely necessary for the disposal of this Civil Revision Petition would run thus:
The revision petitioner herein filed E.P., which was returned for compliance. Several times, it was represented and returned and there occurred a delay of 1495 days in representation of the E.P. Wherefore, E.A.No.216 of 2005 was filed for getting the delay condoned in representing the E.P. However, after hearing both sides, the said application was dismissed.
4. Being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the same, this Civil Revision Petition has been focussed on various grounds.
5. The learned Counsel for the revision petitioner would implore and entreat by drawing the attention of this Court to the relevant records that the Advocate for the decree holder left India and went to the United States of America, whereupon it became very difficult for the party concerned to get the case bundle from the Office
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.