SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Mad) 448

G.RAJASURIA
S. Sasikumar – Appellant
Versus
Jegajothi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:S. Pon Senthil Kumaran, Advocate.
For the Respondents: R1, Notice returned unserved, R2, Given up.

ORDER:

1. C.R.P(PD)(MD)No.1384 of 2011 has been filed to get set aside the order dated 21.01.2011 passed in the Memo in O.S.No.17 of 2007 by the learned District Munsif, Kovilpatti.

2. C.R.P(PD)(MD)No.1385 of 2011 has been filed to get set aside the order dated 21.01.2011 passed in the Memo in O.S.No.28 of 2007 by the learned District Munsif, Kovilpatti.

3. Heard the learned Counsel for the revision petitioner who would pilot the case of his client to the effect that there are two suits filed by the opponent namely the plaintiff, seeking the following reliefs:

O.S.No.17 of 2007:

"Tamil"

(extracted as such)

In the suit in O.S.No.17 of 2007, the revision petitioner was not one of the defendants. However, in the suit in O.S.No.28 of 2007, the revision petitioner is one of the defendants. No doubt, joint trial is being conducted. While so, after commencement of the trial, a Memo was filed seeking the following direction:

"You are requested to produce the following documents which are in the custody of Defendant No.2 for the purpose of cross examination of DW-1 about the particulars of that document.

1) 12.12.2005 --- Registered sale deed in favors of Defendant No.1 executed by the










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top