1. This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to get set aside the order dated 27.09.2012 passed in I.A.No.456 of 2012 in O.S.No.3 of 2010, by the learned Subordinate Judge, Ramanathapuram.

2. Heard both sides.

3. A recapitulation and re'sume' of facts absolutely necessary and germane for the disposal of this Civil Revision Petition would run thus:

The revision petitioner herein, being the defendant in the suit O.S.No.3 of 2010 filed by the plaintiff for recovery of possession of the suit property, being an agricultural land measuring an extent of one Acre and 74 Cents, sought for an appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to visit the suit property, measure the same and note down the physical features. Whereupon the lower Court, after hearing both sides, dismissed it, as the appointment of Advocate Commissioner was unnecessary.

4. Being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the order passed by the lower Court, this Civil Revision Petition has been focussed on various grounds.

5. The learned Counsel for the revision petitioner placing reliance on the grounds of revision petition would pyramid his arguments, which could succinctly and precisely be set out thus:

The suit