1. The Petitioner/Defacto Complainant has preferred the present Criminal Revision Petition as against the order dated 25/8/2010 in Crl.M.P.No.3344 of 2008 in C.C.No.28 of 2008 passed by the Learned Judicial Magistrate, Lalgudi.

2. The Learned Judicial Magistrate, Lalgudi, while passing the impugned order in Crl.M.P.No.3344 of 2008, on 25/8/2010, has inter alia observed that there is no provision for reinvestigation after filing of the final report and after the examination of witnesses and further that some more Accused is involved in the examination of the crime they can be added and in the interest of Justice, ultimately dismissed the Petition.

3. Assailing the correctness of the order of dismissal passed by the trial Court in Crl.M.P.No.3344 of 2008 on 25/8/2010, the Learned Counsel for the Revision Petitioner/ Defacto Complainant contends that the trial Court has failed to appreciate the necessary ingredients of section 173 (8) of Cr.P.C.

4. It is the further submission of the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner that the trial Court has failed to note neither the Police nor the Accused persons have chosen to file counter to Crl.M.P.No.3344 of 2008 and as a matter of