M.VENUGOPAL
C. Sonamuthu – Appellant
Versus
R. Barsha Beevi – Respondent
1. The Revision petitioner/complainant has preferred the instant Criminal Revision Petition as against the order dated 03.07.2012 in Crl.M.P.No.526 of 2012 in C.C.No.239 of 2012 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate (Fast Track No.I), Nagercoil.
2. The Learned Judicial Magistrate, Nagercoil (FTC-I) while passing the impugned order dated 03.07.2012 in Cr.M.P.No.526 of 2012 in C.C.No.239 of 2012 has interalia observed that the writing of Rs.50,000/-in figure, in Ex.P.1 cheque, to find out whether the signature is similar in the cheque and other details namely, whether the numerical number 5 and other letters are different once, an opportunity is to be provided to the accused to find out the genuineness of the same, in the interest of justice and consequently ordered sending of Ex.P.1 cheque to be examined by a hand writing expert and for obtaining his report.
3. That a part, the trial Court has ordered that an examination report is to be filed by finding of as to whether the numerical letter of Rs.50,000/-in Ex.P.1 cheque has been written with signature in the same ink and also further to ascertain whether the numerical Number 5 seen in the details of Rs.50,000/-has b
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.