1. The petitioner has embarked upon an evidence hunting spree to substantiate his allegations in the complaint filed before court The said complaint is based on certain news items which appeared in newspapers. Apart from the clippings from those newspapers, the petitioner is not possessed of any acceptable legal evidence to substantiate the averments made by him in the complaint. Therefore he wanted to examine the respondents herein and to direct them to produce certain documents. The respondents, on getting summons filed affidavits and petition before court. In the affidavit the third respondent contended that non of the documents referred to in the summons is in his custody and that he is not in a position to produce the same. The first respondent averred that out of the two documents directed to the produced by him, the second did not reach him and that the first document has been entrusted with the second respondent in connection with the enquiry which is being conducted by him. The second respondent has stated that the documents summoned to be produced are unpublished official records, disclosure of which will be prejudicial to the interest of the State and that they