1997 Supreme(Mad) 204
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.A.Swami, C.J. and Kanakaraj, J.
Emmanuel Teacher Training Institute represented by its Manager, C. Rajan, Venus Compound, Vallam, Tenkasi Taluk, Tirunelveli Kattabomman District and others.
Versus
The Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, National Council for Teacher Education, and others
W.P.No. 12323 of 1996 and W.P.No. 15662 of 1996 to W.P.No. 15663 of 1996W.P.No. 15664 of 1996W.P.No. 15665 of 1996, W.M.P. No.16641 of 1996, W.M.P. No.16642 of 1996 and W.M.P. No.21481 of 1996W.M.P. No.21482 of 1996W.M.P. No.21483 of 1996W.M.P. No.21484 of 1996
Decided On : 11th February, 1997
A. Immanuel and D. Rajagopal, for Petitioners.
S. Udayakumar, for Additional Central Government Standing Counsel, for Respondent No. 1.
K.P.H. Thulasiraman, Government Advocate, for Respondent Nos.2 to 4.
State Governments not applying proper mind in issuing no objection certificates.
Headnote:National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993—Section 12—Issue of no objection certificates by State Governments—Non-application of norms for issuance of no-objection certificate by State Governments—Orders passed quashed considering the guidelines issued by National Council, which are of binding nature.
K.A. Swami, C.J.:
In all these writ petitions, the petitioners have sought for quashing the orders of the State Government refusing to grant ‘no objection certificate’ as required by Regulations 5(e) and 5(f) of the National Council for Teacher Education (Application for Recognition, the Manner for Submission Determination of Conditions for Recognition of Institutions and Permission to Start New Course or Training) Regulations, 1995. (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Regulations’).
2. The State Government has rejected the applications, seeking ‘no objection certificate’ on the following grounds:
“In Tamil Nadu trained certificate holders are unable to be given appointment, therefore ‘no objection’ will not be given and the said decision is taken by the Government. This is for your information.”
3. The State Government, by G.O.Ms. No.802 (Education, Science and Technology Department), dated 16.9.1994 took a policy decision that no new private teacher training Institute(s) shall be permitted to be opened or recognised in the State from the academic year 1994-95, on the ground that there were several trained teachers, who were not employed. The Government Order, G O.Ms. No.802 reads thus:
“The Government have, for sometime, been considering the need to have new private Teacher Training Institute in the State. The Government have very carefully examined this question and they have come to the conclusion that an appropriate policy in this regard has to be formulated taking into consideration the number of students being trained every year by the Teacher Training Institutes and the approximate requirement of trained teachers every year and also the trained teachers already available. The Government consider that the number of trained teachers coming out of institutions should not be in excess of the requirements and there should not be commercialization of teacher education. The Government have therefore made an assessment of the availability of trained teachers waiting for appointment and the potential to absorb the teachers already trained and those to be trained in future. It has been found that there are 57,082, that is, nearly 60,000 Secondary Grade Teachers on the live registers of the employment exchanges in the State as on 31.12.1993. It is estimated that apart from the immediate requirement, the vacancies that will arise in future will be only of the order of about 3,000 to 5,000 per annum. The Government after taking into account all these factors have decided that in view of the manpower surplus in the availability of trained Secondary Grade teachers no new Private Teachers Training Institute need be permitted to be opened or recognised in the State from the academic year 1994-95.
2. Accordingly the Government hereby notify that no new private Teacher Training Institute (s) shall be permitted to be opened or recognised in the State from the academic year 1994-95.”
4. It may be pointed out here that in order to start Teachers Training Institute, it is necessary to obtain recognition from the Regional committee, as per Sec.14 of the National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’) For the purpose of making an application for recognition, as per Regulations 5(e) and 5(f) of the Regulations, it is necessary for the applicants to obtain ‘no objection certificate’ from the State Government. It is the Regional Committee which has to pass an order as to whether the Teachers Training Institute should be recognised or not.
5. In order to enable the State Government to consider the request for ‘no objection certificate’ the National council for Teacher Education, New Delhi, has framed certain guidelines in its Second Meeting of the General Body held on 4th December, 1996. Those guidelines are called “Guidelines for establishment of Teacher Training Institution and introduction of new programmes-issue of No Objection’ Certificate by States/UTs.” Nine guidelines have been framed. Out of the nine g