U.L.BHAT
M. J. George – Appellant
Versus
S. I. of Police, Authikad – Respondent
The complainant in Crl.M.P. No. 2360, of 1982 on the file, of the Judicial Magistrate of the Second Class No. 11, Trichur, who filed the complaint against Sub-Inspector of Police, Anticad Police Station alleging offences under sections 379 and 384 , Indian Penal Code, being aggrieved by the order of the Magistrate dismissing the complaint for want of sanction under section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has filed this criminal revision, petition.
2. There can be no doubt that Sub-Inspector of Police is a public servant within the meaning of section 21, Indian Penal Code. The question is whether a complaint against a Sub-Inspector of Police would fall within sub- section (1) of section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in which case alone sanction of the State Government will be necessary for any prosecution. The learned Magistrate took the view that section 197(1) will apply in the case of prosecution of a Sub-Inspector of Police and this view is contested by the revision petitioner.
3. The main part of sub- section (1) of section 197 reads thus:
(1) When any person who is or was Judge or Magistarte or a public resvant not removable from his office save by or with t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.