SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Mad) 68

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. Nainar Sundaram, J.
P. B. Srinivasan and another
Versus
T. P. S. Varadhan
O. P No. 200 of 1979 and O. P No. 212 of 1979
Decided On : 4th February, 1980

Advocates Appeared:
A. S. Raman and T. E. Parthasarathi, for Petitioners.
V. R. Biksheswaran and Banumathi, for Respondent.

Relief not to be sought by regular suit.

Headnote:Indian Succession Act, 1925—Section 301—Executor—Exercise of power by Court u/s 301—Held, removal of executor and appointing successor can be done under section 301—Regular suit can not be filed for the relief.

       

JUDGMENT: —

These two original petitions have been filed by the second son and the widow of a predeceased son of one late Dr. P. B. Annangarachari under the provisions of the Indian Succession Act (XXXIX of 1925) (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The proceedings concern the registered will of late Dr. P. B. Annangarachari which is of the date 26th April, 1973. The respondent in the two petitions is the executor appointed under the said will. O. P. No. 200 of 1979 is preferred under section 301 of the Act for the removal of the respondent as executor appointed under the will, O. P. No. 212 of of 1979 is one filed under sections 192 and 194 of the Act for a direction to the respondent to deliver to the petitioners possession of the X-Ray unit known as T. Nagar X-Rays, situate at No. 99, Usman Road, T. Nagar,Madras-17, on the ground, that the respondent has no lawful title to be in possession thereof. Before the respective cases of the parties are considered on merits, it becomes necessary to set out certain events which have preceded the institution of the present proceedings. Even during the life-time of late Dr. P. B. Annangarachari, the respondent seems to have been put in charge of the X-Ray unit at the premises in question. This is also evident from Exhibit P-9, copy of a letter addressed by the respondent to late Dr. P. B. Annangarachari, dated 23rd April, 1972, and copy of the reply dated 2nd October, 1972, written by late Dr. P. B. Annangarachari to the respondent. These two letters disclose that there was a register of dissatisfaction by the respondent with regard to the notes of instructions given by late Dr. P. B. Annangarachari over the manning of the X-Ray Unit and that was repelled by late Dr. P. B. Annangarachari pointing out to the respondent that his complaint was in bad taste and ignored actual facts. On 28th April, 1973, late Dr. P. B. Annangarachari executed the will in question under the original of Exhibit P-1 (which is a photostat copy) bequeathing the properties to his second son, the first petitioner, and the widow of his pre-deceased son, the second petitioner herein. The petitioners are the beneficiaries with regard to the X-Ray unit and as stated above, the executor appointed under the said Will is the respondent.

2. On 8th September, 1973, late Dr. P. B. Annangarachari gave a general power under Exhibit P-7 to Dr. S. Srinivasachari, who is his eldest son-in-law. Under this general power, Dr. S. Srinivasachari was given the power to take charge of the running of the X-Ray unit, maintain accounts expand the sections, collect moneys due and payable to the X-Ray unit and do all further acts and things necessary for the purpose of efficiently running the X-Ray unit. It was further declared that the said power is irrevocable for a period of three years from the date of its execution. Dr. S. Srinivasachari seemed to have entered into an arrangement with the respondent, permitting him to run the X-Ray unit and agreeing to certain conditions. The arrangement was agreed to be in force from 1st April, 1976 till 31st March, 1979, and the understanding was that if any of the conditions stipulated was not adhered to, the arrangement should be revoked. The arrangement was reduced to writing and the document in the handwriting of Dr. S. Srinivasachari has been marked in this case as Exhibit R-1. It does not bear the signature of either party. The contents of Exhibit R-1 run as follows:

“I, T. P. S. Varadhan, residing at 44-A, Thambiah Reddy Street, Madras-33, hereby agree to run the T. Nagar X-Rays in the same premises under the following terms and conditions: —

1. To take X-Rays and collect all money due to the Department and run the Department efficiently.

2. To pay the proprietor Dr. P. B. A. or to his nominee or to his heirs in the event of his death, a sum of Rs. 100 (Rupees one hundred only) per day.

3. To pay into any S. B. a/c Rs. 10 (Rupees Ten only) as a reserve fund for renewal and repairs.

4. To pay the bil


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top