SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Mad) 456

G.RAMANUJAM
Arumugha Nadar – Appellant
Versus
Kumara Pillai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M. S. Umapathy of Raj 8 Raj, for Appellant.
Miss O. K. Sridevi, for Respondents 1 and 3.

ORDER:—

This appeal is directed against the order in I.A No, 111 of 1976 in O. S. No. 60 of 1972 on the file of the Sub-Court, Nagercoil, scaling down the decree amount from Rs. 19,158.75 to Rs. 11,493 42 at the instance of the first defendant on the ground that he is an agriculturist entitled to the benefit of Act IV of 1938 as amended by Act VIII of 1973. The plaintiff-decreeholder has filed this appeal questioning the correctness of the findings of the Court below that the first defendant-respondent is an agriculturist.

2. On 7th May, 1960, one Adikesavaperumal executed a hypothecation bond for Rs. 12,500 in favour of one Ponnammal. On 30th October, 1962, the mortgagor, Adikesavaperumal expired leaving Kumara Pillai, the first defendant as his sole heir. As the said first defendant was a lunatic, the Official Receiver, Nagercoil, was appointed as the guardian of his property and one Kesava Piliai was appointed as his personal guardian in O.P. No. 73 of 1962 The Official Receiver realised some income from the properties of the first defendant and paid in all on various dates between 4th August, 1969 and 23rd December, 1971, Rs. 2,210. The mortgagee, Ponnammal assigned the mortgage












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top