SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Mad) 4859

P.R.SHIVAKUMAR
P. Lakshmanan – Appellant
Versus
Muniappan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:P. Valliappan, Advocate.
For the Respondent:N. Manoharan, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. The defendant in the original suit is the appellant in the second appeal. Muniappan, the respondent herein/plaintiff filed the suit O.S.No.69/2003 on the file of the Sub Court, Sankari for the recovery of a sum of Rs.1,45,000/- together with an interest thereon at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of plaint till date of realisation based on an unregistered usufructuary mortgage deed dated 19.06.1998. The suit was decreed by the trial court directing the appellant herein/defendant to pay the said amount claimed in the plaint to the plaintiff along with an interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of plaint till realisation as against the claim of interest @ 18% per annum. The appellant herein/defendant was also directed by the trial court to pay the cost of litigation to the respondent herein/plaintiff. Challenging the said decree dated 19.12.2005 passed by the trial court in O.S.No.69 of 2003, an appeal was filed by the appellant herein/defendant in A.S.No.16 of 2006 on the file of the court of the Principal District Judge, Salem. The learned Principal District Judge, Salem dismissed the appeal without cost by his judgment and decree dated 05.07.2006 conf












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top